diff options
| -rwxr-xr-x | report/paper.md | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/report/paper.md b/report/paper.md index 89e260c..17972c5 100755 --- a/report/paper.md +++ b/report/paper.md @@ -252,7 +252,11 @@ The difference between the top $k$ accuracies of the two methods gets smaller as \end{center} \end{figure} -The improved results due to $k$-reciprocal re-ranking can be explained by considering...re-ranking can be explained by considering... +The improved results due to $k$-reciprocal re-ranking may be explained by considering that re-ranks based on second order neighbours, +that is, the neighbours of the neighbours. For neighbours which display identifiable features, such as a backpack or binder that is +not visible in the query but visible in a close neighbour, the reranking algorithm is able to infer that the strong relationship based on this newly introduced +feature such as a backpack or folder by the neighbour, uniuqly identify other identities in the gallery with the same feature, and moving them up the rankinlist +as a result despite the identifiable feature being hidden in the query. EXAMPLE BACKPACK HERE # Conclusion |