1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/report/paper.md b/report/paper.md
index faa0188..6c5ff9b 100755
--- a/report/paper.md
+++ b/report/paper.md
@@ -279,10 +279,10 @@ after each step.
 
 Varying the values of $M_{\textrm{pca}}$ and $M_{\textrm{lda}}$ we obtain the average recognition accuracies 
 reported in figure \ref{fig:ldapca_acc}. Peak accuracy of 93% can be observed for $M_{\textrm{pca}}=115$, $M_{\textrm{lda}}=41$;
-howeverer accuracies above 90% can be observed for $130 > M_{\textrm{pca}} 90$ and $50 > M_{\textrm{lda}} > 30$ values between 30 and 50.
+howeverer accuracies above 90% can be observed for $130 > M_{\textrm{pca}} > 90$ and $50 > M_{\textrm{lda}} > 30$.
 
 Recognition accuracy is significantly higher than PCA, and the run time is roughly the same,
-vaying between 0.11s(low $M_{\textrm{pca}}$) and 0.19s(high $M_{\textrm{pca}}$). Execution times
+vaying between 0.11s (low $M_{\textrm{pca}}$) and 0.19s (high $M_{\textrm{pca}}$). Execution times
 are displayed in table \ref{tab:time}.
 
 \begin{figure}