From 2de989ff2d3409d60584b8fd75fe6be28fadfc06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nunzip Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:46:54 +0000 Subject: Fix grammar --- report/paper.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'report') diff --git a/report/paper.md b/report/paper.md index faa0188..6c5ff9b 100755 --- a/report/paper.md +++ b/report/paper.md @@ -279,10 +279,10 @@ after each step. Varying the values of $M_{\textrm{pca}}$ and $M_{\textrm{lda}}$ we obtain the average recognition accuracies reported in figure \ref{fig:ldapca_acc}. Peak accuracy of 93% can be observed for $M_{\textrm{pca}}=115$, $M_{\textrm{lda}}=41$; -howeverer accuracies above 90% can be observed for $130 > M_{\textrm{pca}} 90$ and $50 > M_{\textrm{lda}} > 30$ values between 30 and 50. +howeverer accuracies above 90% can be observed for $130 > M_{\textrm{pca}} > 90$ and $50 > M_{\textrm{lda}} > 30$. Recognition accuracy is significantly higher than PCA, and the run time is roughly the same, -vaying between 0.11s(low $M_{\textrm{pca}}$) and 0.19s(high $M_{\textrm{pca}}$). Execution times +vaying between 0.11s (low $M_{\textrm{pca}}$) and 0.19s (high $M_{\textrm{pca}}$). Execution times are displayed in table \ref{tab:time}. \begin{figure} -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf