Fix labels problem with reconstruction face

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/report/paper.md b/report/paper.md
index e756f69..4a5e90a 100755
--- a/report/paper.md
+++ b/report/paper.md
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ number 21 and 2 respectively, are reconstructed as shown in fig.\ref{face10rec}
 of M=10, M=100, M=200, M=300. The last picture is the original face.
 
 ![Reconstructed Face C21\label{face160rec}](fig/face160rec.pdf)
+
 ![Reconstructed Face C2\label{face10rec}](fig/face10rec.pdf)
 
 It is already observable that the improvement in reconstruction is marginal for M=200 
@@ -334,8 +335,10 @@ vaying between 0.11s(low M_pca) and 0.19s(high M_pca).
 
 The scatter matrices obtained, S\textsubscript{B}(scatter matrix between classes) and 
 S\textsubscript{W}(within-class scatter matrix), respectively show ranks of at most c-1(51) and
-N-c(312 maximum for our standard 70-30 split). The rank of S\textsubscript{W}
-will have the same value of M_pca for M_pca$\leq$N-c.
+N-c(312 maximum for our standard 70-30 split). 
+The rank of S\textsubscript{W} will have the same value of M_pca for M_pca$\leq$N-c.
+
+NEED MORE SCATTER MATRIX CONTENT
 
 Testing with M_lda=50 and M_pca=115 gives 92.9% accuracy. The results of such test can be
 observed in the confusion matrix shown in figure \ref{ldapca_cm}.