aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/report2
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornunzip <np.scarh@gmail.com>2018-12-07 21:10:20 +0000
committernunzip <np.scarh@gmail.com>2018-12-07 21:10:20 +0000
commit939e4e1333f1740ede3af8de639a69eb47a2b817 (patch)
tree86b2ed26cc7a56779ebcd458186790ce58bcd963 /report2
parent18a589bd030ce10133b512bccf716783984abe01 (diff)
downloadvz215_np1915-939e4e1333f1740ede3af8de639a69eb47a2b817.tar.gz
vz215_np1915-939e4e1333f1740ede3af8de639a69eb47a2b817.tar.bz2
vz215_np1915-939e4e1333f1740ede3af8de639a69eb47a2b817.zip
Add introduction
Diffstat (limited to 'report2')
-rwxr-xr-xreport2/paper.md51
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/report2/paper.md b/report2/paper.md
index f70f77a..14f2f98 100755
--- a/report2/paper.md
+++ b/report2/paper.md
@@ -1,12 +1,57 @@
# Summary
+In this report we analysed how distance metrics learning affects classification
+accuracy for the dataset CUHK03. The baseline method used for classification is
+Nearest Neighbors based on Euclidean distance. The improved approach we propose
+mixes Jaccardian and Mahalanobis metrics to obtain a ranklist that takes into
+account also the reciprocal neighbors. This approach is computationally more
+complex, since the matrices representing distances are effectively calculated
+twice. However it is possible to observe a significant accuracy improvement of
+around 10% for the $@rank1$ case. Accuracy improves overall, especially for
+$@rankn$ cases with low n.
+
+# Formulation of the Addresssed Machine Learning Problem
+
+## CUHK03
+
+The dataset CUHK03 contains 14096 pictures of people captured from two
+different cameras. The feature vectors used come from passing the
+rescaled images through ResNet50. Each feature vector contains 2048
+features that we use for classification. The pictures represent 1467 different
+people and each of them appears between 9 and 10 times. The separation of
+train_idx, query_idx and gallery_idx allows to perform taining and validation
+on a training set (train_idx, adequately split between test, train and
+validation keeping the same number of identities). This prevents overfitting
+the algorithm to the specific data associated with query_idx and gallery_idx.
+
+## Probelm to solve
+
+The problem to solve is to create a ranklist for each image of the query set
+by finding the nearest neighbor(s) within a gallery set. However gallery images
+with the same label and taken from the same camera as the query image should
+not be considered when forming the ranklist.
+
+## Nearest Neighbor ranklist
+
+Nearest Neighbor aims to find the gallery image whose feature are the closest to
+the ones of a query image, predicting the class of the query image as the same
+of its nearest neighbor(s). The distance between images can be calculated through
+different distance metrics, however one of the most commonly used is euclidean
+distance, represented as $d=\sqrt{\sum (x-y)^{2}}$.
+
+EXPLAIN KNN BRIEFLY
-# Baseline Formulation
# Baseline Evaluation
-# Formulation of Suggested Improvement
+\begin{figure}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=17em]{fig/baseline.pdf}
+\caption{Recognition accuracy of baseline Nearest Neighbor @rank k}
+\label{fig:baselineacc}
+\end{center}
+\end{figure}
-# Suggested Improvement Evaluation
+# Suggested Improvement
# Conclusion