diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | report/paper.md | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | report/template.latex | 1 |
2 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/report/paper.md b/report/paper.md index 7c57df9..6ebf32d 100644 --- a/report/paper.md +++ b/report/paper.md @@ -268,23 +268,22 @@ Figure \ref{fig:rerank} shows successful re-ranking as performed using the query # Conclusions +Overall the re-ranking method gives a significant improvement to both top $k$ accuracy and mean average precision. +The cost of this operation is an increase in computation time due to the change in complexity from +the baseline, summarized in the table. -\begin{table}[] +\begin{table}[H] \centering \begin{tabular}{ll} \hline \textbf{Process} & \textbf{Complexity} \\ \hline Euclidean Distance Calculatoin & \textit{O(N\textsuperscript{2})} \\ -Mahalanobis Distance Calculatoin & \textit{O(N\textsuperscript{3 (2.708)})} \\ +Mahalanobis Distance Calculatoin & \textit{O(N\textsuperscript{3 (opt:2.708)})} \\ Re-ranking with Jaccard & \textit{O(N\textsuperscript{2}logN)} \\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{tab:complexity} \end{table} -Overall the re-ranking method gives a significant improvement to both top $k$ accuracy and mean average precision. -The cost of this operation is an increase in computation time due to the change in complexity from -the baseline, summarized in the table. - # References diff --git a/report/template.latex b/report/template.latex index 9917236..d459163 100644 --- a/report/template.latex +++ b/report/template.latex @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ $if(fontfamily)$ $else$ \usepackage{lmodern} $endif$ +\usepackage{float} $if(linestretch)$ \usepackage{setspace} \setstretch{$linestretch$} |